|
Post by redgibby on Sept 10, 2010 20:18:02 GMT -5
I was hoping that Skinner would fall to Det!!!!!! LOL. Seriously I hate him cause he eliminated London with Kitchener but love him cause he is just has a knack for finding the back of the net.
|
|
|
Post by redgibby on Sept 10, 2010 20:18:26 GMT -5
I'd take him 3rd
|
|
|
Post by HurricanesGM on Sept 10, 2010 20:19:14 GMT -5
Skinner=Beast however Seguin and Hall are better but I think Skinner is 3rd best forward talent wise, hes 5th or 6th. I wouldnt take Skinner before Niederitter though. explain why.
|
|
|
Post by redgibby on Sept 10, 2010 20:20:27 GMT -5
1. Seguin 2. Hall 3. Gudbranson 4. Skinner 5. ME!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by sniper93 on Sept 10, 2010 20:21:30 GMT -5
Hes bigger, has more talent, and is stronger on the puck. Dont even talk about Skinner taking Kitchener to the finals, Niederietter single handedly beat Russia (playing for Switzerland) in the world juniors. Theres also a reason why Niederietter was a top 5 pick and Skinner wasnt.
|
|
|
Post by jpavs8cluthcy on Sept 10, 2010 20:21:49 GMT -5
Skinner is worth a top-10 pick IMO, but not top-5.
|
|
|
Post by jpavs8cluthcy on Sept 10, 2010 20:22:52 GMT -5
CUPS: Staal: 1 Ovechkin: 0 supporting cast, advantage: Ovechkin......give me a break....If Staal wins in the playoffs with less than Ovechkin and Ovechkin loses, than why not take Staal over Ovechkin? Sure Ovechkin is better, but Staal wins games. I would take Crosby over Ovy in the playoffs and nobody hates Crosby more than me. Ovechkin's playoff supporting cast is S***. Staal has better clutch playoff performers on his team and has been blessed with a S*** load of luck.
|
|
|
Post by redgibby on Sept 10, 2010 20:22:53 GMT -5
Skinner=better then Daniel Erlich
|
|
|
Post by sniper93 on Sept 10, 2010 20:23:20 GMT -5
i agree Jpavs.
|
|
|
Post by HurricanesGM on Sept 10, 2010 20:24:33 GMT -5
CUPS: Staal: 1 Ovechkin: 0 supporting cast, advantage: Ovechkin......give me a break....If Staal wins in the playoffs with less than Ovechkin and Ovechkin loses, than why not take Staal over Ovechkin? Sure Ovechkin is better, but Staal wins games. I would take Crosby over Ovy in the playoffs and nobody hates Crosby more than me. Ovechkin's playoff supporting cast is crap. Staal has better clutch playoff performers on his team and has been blessed with a crap load of luck. what "luck"?
|
|
|
Post by redgibby on Sept 10, 2010 20:25:29 GMT -5
Top 5 players to build around:
1. Crosby 2. Ovie 3. Nash-My pick 4. Doughty-My pick 5. M. Richards/Toews
|
|
|
Post by HurricanesGM on Sept 10, 2010 20:26:10 GMT -5
Top 5 players to build around: 1. Crosby 2. Ovie 3. Nash-My pick 4. Doughty-My pick 5. M. Richards/Toews Steven Stamkos says hello
|
|
|
Post by redgibby on Sept 10, 2010 20:27:58 GMT -5
And I say goodbye...dont let the door hit your butt on the way out Mr. Stamkos
|
|
|
Post by sniper93 on Sept 10, 2010 20:29:01 GMT -5
And I say goodbye...dont let the door hit your butt on the way out Mr. Stamkos lol but i pick Stammer over Nash anyday.
|
|
|
Post by HurricanesGM on Sept 10, 2010 20:30:57 GMT -5
still waiting to hear the "luck" that Staal has had.
|
|